
Candy is an important part of a happy life. In “Lewis Black Hates Candy Corn: A Rebuttal,” Michael Ian Black praises candy corn in opposition to Lewis Black’s insistence that candy corn is horrible. Michael Ian Black represents Halloween tradition, candy corn makers, and all the trick-or-treaters of America in his essay as he defends the tasty treat. However defensive Michael Ian Black is, he is wrong, and Lewis Black is right. Candy corn is simply not a delicious treat.
Since candy corn is candy, the taste should be the most important aspect. Michael Ian Black states that candy corn tastes "like it was made out of magic" (138). He then goes on "If magic had a taste," (138) which means it obviously does not, and therefore, nothing can taste like magic. Lewis Black thinks it tastes "like it was made out of oil" (qtd. in Black 138). That, too, is not true, but the spirit of the statement is. Candy should not taste like oil. Candy should taste good. Oil does not taste good. Candy corn does not taste good. It tastes like chemicals, the kind of taste that develops when people are in an enclosed,un-vented space while they are cleaning with Windex.
[next point]
[next point]
Even though Halloween causes a boost in sales, candy corn is simply part of tradition. It is not a popular treat at any other time of year. Therefore, it is simply not popular, and not a scrumptious snack.
Work Cited
Black, Michael Ian. "Lewis Black Hates Candy Corn: A Rebuttal."
My Custom Van...And 50 Other Mind-Blowing Essays That Will Blow Your Mind All Over Your Face. NY: Gallery Books, 2009. 137-142. Print.